Even if it works, does anyone want it?
Cerebral is not only a signal-processing project. A system can clear every technical bar and still fail, because the setup is tedious, the device is visible, the data feels sensitive, or the value does not justify the routine.
The point of running the technical study first is that the adoption study can then ask about real trade-offs instead of invented ones.
Once Study 01 produces a performance-versus-sensor-count curve, that curve becomes the attribute levels people are asked to choose between: this much accuracy for this much setup time, this many contacts for this much comfort. Until then there is nothing defensible to put in front of a participant, which is why this section has structure and no findings.
No survey has been run. No willingness-to-pay, trust or comfort figure appears anywhere on this site, and none will until there is data behind it.
PlannedA dashboard reporting sample size, participant characteristics, question wording, conditions, results, statistics and limitations, in aggregate only. Participant-level data will not be published.
