What the sensors can see, and what a model can do with it.
Two layers. The signal layer is physics and physiology: what reaches an electrode and in what state. The model layer is what can be recovered from it. Conflating the two is how neurotechnology gets oversold.
Amplitude ranges above are general background from the EEG literature, not Cerebral measurements. Exact figures depend on electrode type, reference, montage and task.
A decoder maps a short window of multichannel voltage onto a label. That is the whole operation. It is not reading language, and it is not reading thought.
Different BCI tasks are routinely spoken about as if they were one capability. They are not. Silent speech, attempted articulation, motor imagery, evoked-potential selection and cognitive-state estimation differ in what the user does, what the signal contains, how much training data is needed, and how well any of it transfers to a new person. Cerebral names the task wherever it makes a claim.
Every significant computational model gets a model card with the same fields, including the uncomfortable ones.
Model cards and experimentsPlannedAn electrode-configuration explorer, an annotated signal viewer, a performance-versus-sensor-count chart and a model comparison. None of them can exist honestly before there is data to put in them.
